The ITER a defective spawn that died before being born

The ITER a defective spawn that died before being born By: José de Jesús Tejada Maury (*) They are plotting us with a deuterium stove lit with a laser tinderbox by an artificial Sun. The supposed search for the hegemonic panacea of plasma energy every day moves a little further from reality, despite the number of scientists and the monetary investments made in said project. There is a long way from saying to doing, says an old saying, and precisely for this reason it has not been possible to consolidate and execute the objectives of this project, that is; They have not been able to obtain the dreamed plasma as the goal of both the Western and Eurasian powers, despite all the human and financial resources, which is constituting not only an underutilization of human resources, but also financial ones and this leads to working at waste of time and money and end up intervening scientists as loose wheels on the project. Huge figures are invested in jets with all this advertising boom to attract world attention and expose as a label their personal egos and the excessive arrogance of feeling powerful masters of knowledge and as always their arrogance and arrogance does not let them see and keeps them blind, since who close all opportunities not to listen to advice or suggestions by feeling masters of power and owners of knowledge and knowledge, backed by the accreditation of the most prestigious universities in their countries. Elaborating a project on paper must have specified its vision, mission, general objectives, specific objectives, but above all a frame of reference, above all knowing the theoretical frame of reference and precisely within the potholes that can be detected with respect to the failed attempt to capture this project, it is detected that one of the major flaws is the error in conceptual matters regarding the concept of fusion and its application within the experimental plan. Particle physics continues to refuse to abolish the concept of nuclear fusion, it is presumed that they do so due to ignorance, orthodox dogma of the classroom or professional prejudices that would imply consequences of having adjusted works, theses, models and even awarded Nobel prizes. works that include this concept. Despite the fact that there are seven partners in the ITER project, including the European Union, Japan, the United States, South Korea, India, Russia and China, it is likely that this plasma fusion energy project is based on misinformation and error in matter of theoretical concepts and in the application of said concepts, that is; reality does not correspond to what is described in terms of science in this regard. Of course, all this framework brings a historical precedent in which an indeterminate number of scientists have worked, accommodating their work not to the context of science, but to private interests or third parties, as has been the case with the hadron collider and the " divine particle "or other works that seek to highlight the image of prestigious Western academies and not develop a true work of scientific application with objective reality to turn it into a distracting sophistry while they wait to see if they get a "tip" that can guide them to to be able to fully develop the project because part of their initiative seems to be adrift due to misinformation or lack of knowledge on the subject. The experimental reactors known through the main information media that advertise this project with so much fuss, which has been in a tailspin and rout because thanks to this reactor we can only interpret after analyzing that the second law of thermodynamics is being confirmed. and that the reactor and the implementation of the fusion concepts cannot continue to be sustained from the academic and scientific point of view. What is the reactor for? If we analyze, only until now we confirm the second law of thermodynamics (Entropy) that expresses to us that: It is not possible for heat to flow from a cold body to a hotter body, without the need for more work that generates this flow because it turns out that the reactor is not capable of producing enough energy to feed back into the system. The amount of energy expended in producing it is greater than that resulting from its operation. This is a clear violation of the second law of thermodynamics because the operators and advisors are unaware that plasma is an intermediate state of matter and that it does not have equilibrium, that is; it is not electrically neutral. Therefore, from there it can be deduced that the plasma is not matter and what is being felt is a transitional energetic caloric effect (heat) for the time that the process lasts without leading to the formation of another heavier element, in this case the transition from hydrogen to helium. It is understood that, if the hydrogen has already changed to helium, this as matter; it is automatically electrically stabilized. Here at this point another question arises: what to do with the resulting helium inside the hood? Here what they are experiencing is a linear process in a dead end that has no return either. What kind of reactions occur in the Sun? It is a question that we must ask ourselves because it is impossible for the Sun to resort to using protium, then deuterium, and finally tritium, to later fuse into helium. At this point there is a scientific inconsistency and this is one of the main reasons why ITER will continue to be a failure. This is concluded because through the analysis of mass spectrometers the studies have revealed the composition of the Sun in 75% hydrogen and 24% helium, which could guide us to state that indeed in the Sun they are taking place. transmutation reactions, not fusion and that the transition from hydrogen to helium and the return of helium to hydrogen is what supplies us with energy in the form of light, since plasma is an intermediate state between processes of mutation and not fusion, First of all, at high temperatures, matter loses its magnetic properties and no matter how cohesive the Sun is, the protons will not react. It could be thought that they slide over each other, but they never react with each other. And having an element like hydrogen in the composition of the Sun for the supposed reactions to occur with its elementary particles, first of all, the hydrogen atoms would have to be fissioned and this would never have allowed the Sun to survive since it would have self-destructed. The case of the Sun is special because it is not static, this transmutation has a lot to do with the influence of its rotational movement in an anticlockwise direction (centripetal force) because every time it emits beta particles it is transmuted into helium and if it does with alpha particles it returns to its light hydrogen, perhaps this is the process that keeps it in a reversible state and that maintains the eternity of an energy source in our nearest star. We can conclude that the Sun is a natural cyclotron whose main function is to transmute hydrogen into helium and this mechanism works for all the stars in our universe. If we plan to develop an artificial Sun we must take into account all these aspects . ITER does not meet even 1% of the structural and scientific conditions to be considered an emulation of a star. Let's hope that to look good to humanity they don't shamelessly burn the hydrogen to affirm that the fusion reactor is ready because if they are selling us a deuterium stove lit with a laser tinderbox, what else could one expect from all this. Of course, taking into account the hydrogen ignition bulb, the security risks would be high. Federick Soddy (1887-1956) in the year 1913, at the same time as Kazimier Fajans, discovered the rules of transmutation: when an atom spontaneously emits an alpha particle, it moves back two squares in the periodic table (alchemists' case of developing gold from lead), in our case it could only go back one since there is no other element in the periodic table before hydrogen, so we would refer to an exception to this rule. The other rule of transmutation when an atom emits a beta particle, it advances one square. This is the case or procedure by which light hydrogen is transformed or transmuted into helium and it is not taking place by fusion as the academic dogma affirms and maintains. The question arises: What are we going to do with the nascent helium? What could happen to the reactor if that were achieved? Therefore, we realize that the system cannot feed back because helium is an inert gas and will still be hotter helium (it will be electrically stabilized), therefore there will be no feedback from the system. Reality shows us that this reactor and any other is not capable of multiplying the energy effect so that it can be used as an alternative source or as a solution for the future. It is not possible and once and for all it is confirmed and reaffirmed that nuclear fusion does not exist as such since not even nature itself has been able to experience it, therefore the definition or concepts that apply not only to the Sun, but to all star are out of step with reality. Precisely in our article the artificial Sun a Chinese tale, reference was made to the fact that within the Sun and the other stars what happens are processes of transmutation of hydrogen into helium and during the process energy is released in the form of light and heat that characterizes to this star For God it would be very difficult to establish that protium will fuse into deuterium and deuterium into tritium, taking into account that protons do not react because they have equal charges and that at high temperatures magnetic properties are lost, physics and nuclear chemistry are lost. they fall short in explanation and description of this phenomenon. It happens that inside the reactor it is a matter of removing the electrons by magnetic means (powerful magnets), while in the Sun the pressure prevents the electrons from dissociating from the hydrogen atoms, which indicates that it keeps them cohesive due to its centripetal effect and due to the speed of rotation it acts as a cyclotron for transmutation and not as a nuclear fusion reactor. From this humble position, with the availability of heart and thought, it is suggested that they not make so much media display, since this action only puts them in the international public arena as fighters for a utopia defeated by historical reality. It is time to abandon all that fantasy and they are reiterated that they are not going to deceive us anymore with their ill-fated projects. Overview: Due to the observations inside that thermal machine wrongly called a nuclear reactor, since they are the ones who claim to use deuterium and use magnetic mechanisms to stabilize the plasma, a situation that does not withstand scientific analysis since mathematically they have not explained the amount in the respective units of the elements used to determine the efficiency of the project, in this case the Tokamak project to establish if it is greater than, equal to or less than zero and apparently as we go, the tokamak project (ITER) has an efficiency less than zero (negative value) which makes us presume that it is an impossible project. It leaves us with many doubts about how, at extreme temperatures of millions of degrees Celsius, magnetic properties can be sustained and atomic nuclei react when, based on the Curie temperature, it is known that this is impossible. (see bibliography). On the other hand, it can be established that energy is a variable dependent on matter, they are coexistent, they are correlated with each other without existing independently. Plasma is not an ionized gas, but plasma is an intermediate state of matter that results as an effect of electrifying a gas. Plasma is not matter, which is why in the previous month's publication on climate, atmospheric weather and ozone, when it was alluded to the fact that ozone was produced through the ionization of atmospheric oxygen and ultraviolet radiation; This process generated heat and as soon as it stabilized as ozone, it was stable and electrically balanced. For this reason, it is impossible to try to stabilize the plasma with strong magnets like those of ITER. It is reiterated that at high temperatures magnetic bodies lose these conditions in an irreversible state. In the same way we must differentiate between the electromagnetic nature of light and the antimagnetic nature of plasma, it is convenient that we know how to differentiate this condition and reiterate that no matter how powerful the magnets are, they will never be able to thermally insulate the plasma from the walls of the tokamak. In addition, said tokamak project leaves us with very clear elements of judgment so that we can conclude that the universe has always existed as forms of matter and energy as a pre-universe, which indeed evolved through processes of transmutation and not fusion. 1 Finally, it is also drawn as conclusions that this tokamak project would not be so ecological since it necessarily uses resources such as seawater, which is one of the main freshwater reserves of nature and, in addition, it would use water as an enhancer ( steam) to drive turbines and also as coolants. Suggestions: It is necessary to review and reassess the concept of nuclear fusion and consider the use of transmutation as a real process that has been developed in the process of star formation and within the evolution of the universe. Apparently the concept of transmutation is relegated from the field of science to be considered as pseudoscience and is only applicable when the masters of knowledge are interested in applying it, such as the case of "virus mutation", when animal biology is known as a only case of mutation as it is from the chrysalis to the butterfly (metamorphosis), however, science with all its tools does not know or understand how this process occurs. Unlike in physics, the transmutation of elements does exist, just as they experienced it. Federick Soddy (1887-1956) in the year 1913, at the same time as Kazimier Fajans. What the scientists in charge of the project ignore It is known that simple bodies that were previously believed to be homogeneous are always mixtures of substances, called isotopes; each of which has a whole number as atomic weight, but which, due to the relatively very different abundance of them, isotopes of the same element, make it ultimately have a fractional atomic weight. Thus, hydrogen consists of three isotopes that are: ordinary hydrogen, whose atomic weight is 1; Deuterium D, with an atomic weight of 2, and Tritium or tritium, T with an atomic weight of 3, in total, the atomic weight of the three classes of hydrogen in 1.008; for the last two (deuterium and tritium) exist in negligible quantities, and tritium, which is radioactive, only occurs accidentally. It is not possible to understand how it is intended to "fuse" tritium from deuterium if only this occurs accidentally by a random process and with elements that exist in insignificant quantities. Therefore, the chemical atomic weights of the elements are the relative average weights of their isotopes, according to their abundance. In the case of hydrogen, it is explained why the average atomic weight of its three isotopes is so small, because for 5,000 ordinary hydrogen atoms, there is only one (1) deuterium. The way in which they intend to explain to the world how they obtain deuterium and easily state that the objective of ITER is to obtain tritium derived from the fusion of deuterium leaves us with more unanswered questions. So where is the objective of the project if the goal was to fuse isotopes of hydrogen to obtain helium? Grades: ITER: International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor. Hydrogen has 3 naturally occurring isotopes: hydrogen-1, hydrogen-2, and hydrogen-3; which are commonly known as protium, deuterium and tritium, and which respectively would have one proton; a proton and a neutron, and a proton and two neutrons. Isotopes are atoms of the same element that have different mass numbers because the number of neutrons varies between them. The concept of isotope is reduced only to atoms, since it is an intrinsic characteristic in atoms of the same nature. Hydrogen is the first element on the periodic table. It is the lightest chemical element that exists, its atom is made up of a proton and an electron and it is stable in the form of a diatomic molecule (H2). Gaseous chemical element, symbol He, atomic number 2, and atomic weight 4.0026. Helium is one of the noble gases in group O of the periodic table. It is the second lightest element. The term "Tokamak" comes from a Russian acronym meaning "magnetic spiral toroid chamber". It is an experimental machine designed to harness fusion energy. Alpha rays: positively charged particles, with a mass 4 times greater than that of hydrogen, are helium nuclei or helions. Beta rays: they are beams of negative particles Pierre Curie identified them as electrons. (1) https://www.meer.com/es/61374-how-the-universe-arise Bibliography: https://www.meer.com/es/68764-the-artificial-sun-a-chinese-tale http://infoposta.com.ar/notas/12903/el-tiempo-atmosf%C3%A9rico-clima-y-el-ozono/ https://www.google.com/search?q=alotriop%C3%ADa&rlz=1C1VDKB_esCO1034CO1034&oq=&aq s=chrome.1.69i59i450l8.64889304j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Is%C3%B3topo https://analyzing-testing.netzsch.com/en/training-know-how/glossary/curie-temperature https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Part%C3%ADcula_alfa https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Part%C3%ADcula_beta . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLLtbcXWbic&feature=youtu.be&ab_channel=UBUinvestiga Jose de Jesus Henao. General mineral chemistry Volume I. Second edition. Editorial Bedout- Medellín.1955. Morris Hein-Susana Arena. Chemistry fundamentals. International Thomson Editores SA de CV Translation Eng. Virgilio Gonzáles Pozo Faculty of Chemistry UNAM.ISBN 968-7524-20-2.1977. Printed in Mexico.1997. (*) Scientific researcher.