viernes, 5 de abril de 2019

Encounters of pharmacovirus: the end of viruses


Enigmas  of pharmacovirus: the end of viruses

Viruses are parasites that live at the expense of macro and microscopic organisms

                                                                                                               By: José De Jesús Tejada Maury (*)

The noblest path that knowledge can take is a science at the service of humanity. (José Tejada Maury).

Much has been speculated on viruses, including traditional medicine handling their dogmas has imposed the belief of the indestructibility of viruses and this has become a real odyssey for those who have in their hands the mission of prescribing drugs to treat their patients and the incompetence of orthodox traditional medicine before the relentless fight of the virus, the doctors were sold the idea that the viruses are mutated and this is what prevents them from being destroyed in a timely and adequate manner, besides the affected person has that learn to live with them for life using the palliatives that the pharmaceutical industry formulates, that is, they sell antivirals that are inhibitors of the protease enzyme that supposedly prevents the replication of the virus, also if it is herpes they formulate a antiviral and a topical cream that helps relieve stinging and sprouts that do not last more than four days, however the antiviral for cases of Herpes in any form, order a strong dose that ultimately the problem is not solved and reappears under circumstances of "stress" or when there is too much heat as it happens in tropical regions.

The body's immune system does not detect parasites, much less a virus that needs a vehicle or a host to mobilize or activate, hence the scientific literature has never interpreted this mechanism and simply mentions that the viruses "mutate" "Or they" hide "and therefore the impossibility of destroying them.

It is questioned the existence of a supposed virus that attacks the immune system (HIV), which induces us to conclude for this case that there really are parasites that steal nutrients from the body and prevent the good production of immunoglobulins as proteins that make up the immune system. Only a PCR could confirm the existence of this pathogen and not determine it by a random or trial scale (Elisa) and much less a test that indicates the uncertainty of what would be the response of the organism to a supposed HIV (Western blot). The supposed existence of HIV is determined on a floor and a roof of a subclassification of T lymphocytes on CD4 and not on the basis of a real virus by PCR.

Within the conversations and exchanges I have had with other researchers to try to clarify the matter, already in these moments of life has been clearing the mystery of viruses, including claims that viruses set the boundary between the living and the inert, a virus by itself can not exist, hence for its motility or mobility requires a host or living organism to move, can not stay in the cells of the human body, but they do so through the macro and microorganisms such as parasites We must understand that bacteria have an innate defense system therefore viruses do not stay in the bacteria of the human body, but in the parasites.

 For years I was interested in herpes shingles, because ancestrally it has been saying that he walks and leaves a marquilla by its passage through the different parts of the body where it circulates mostly on the skin, and I focused my attention on herpes VIS- 1 as VIS-2 (genital). VIS-1 and VIS-2 are only transmitted from person to person if it has parasites, for this case VIS-2 is not a sexual transmission, it is a parasitic transmission of both emitter as the receiver, because the carrier has it, but if the receiver is clean and free of parasites is never contagious, we would have to consider not so much the parasites in the digestive tracts, but at the level of brain, mucous membranes, muscles, nerves, under the skin, lungs, tissues, etc.

The scours that produce both VIS-1 and VIS-2 on the skin are due to the fact that they use the mites to move, explains why heat reappears with the symptoms of the virus. At this crossroads we realize that the retroviral is just another palliative in the drug business, because the solution is to destroy the means used by the virus to travel, as well as herpes shingles, its name and situation clearly explains that it is mobilizing through Giardiasis, pinworms, worm (shingles), mites, fungi, nematodes, etc. Therefore, if the medium or its host organism (mites, nematodes, etc.) is not destroyed, no virus will disappear from the human body. Hence, antibiotics do not work for these cases and retrovirals are only palliative.

Therefore, to destroy all viruses at the root, systemic antiparasitics must be formulated, since they do fight parasites as host entities of the virus anywhere in the human body. In addition, the doctor must formulate the corresponding doses, both the initial dose and the dose that is dosed for them. avoid recurrence within the required time.

Conclusions:

As mentioned above, the immune system does not recognize parasites. How is it possible that I will recognize a virus that uses another parasite as a host if it is camouflaged inside? We return to the question: why better detect it with PCR? Surely we will understand the reality: HIV does not exist, therefore it is concluded that this HIV has been not only a hoax, but a strategy to formulate retrovirals as a market strategy and at the same time to include victims in a blacklist with aims not very clear and keep the population submerged in fear, terror and discrimination, because a retroviral assumption has been used for something that does not really exist, even though the semantics have changed in the delivery of the diagnosis of "seropositive to reactive "that in no way modifies the arbitrary and anti-scientific protocols established for its detection and subsequent diagnosis. However, these actions end in the most absolute impunity due to the dictatorial power and the conspiracy that exists between the Center for Disease Control and Diagnosis (CDC), the Food and Drug Control Agency (FDA), the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), in addition to the respective organizations that exist within the European Community such as the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

It follows the brazenness of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, the Karolinska Institute, the Swedish Academy and Parliament and Swedish Bank to have been awarded in 2008 with the Nobel prize for medicine to French virologist Luc Montagnier with French biochemistry Françoise Barré-Sinoussi for the "discovery of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) that causes AIDS" and also shared with the German doctor Harald zur Hausen for having invented the foolishness that the human papillomavirus (HPV) is the cause of cancer of the neck uterine.

Hence, we need to channel science, professional practice of the doctor in a more ethical and human way, but for this it is necessary to make a detailed and thorough review of the scientific literature that is imposed through protocols to the academic world and scientific. The academies and research centers must enter to validate, verify and confirm everything that has been protocolized in terms of scientific literature and the procedures to be applied to patients both to prevent and to treat the respective health effects.

Vocabulary:

PCR (Polymerase chain reaction):

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a laboratory technique that allows small pieces of DNA to be amplified to identify microscopic germs that cause disease.

Systemic: Dícese of the disease that affects in a general way to all organs or structures that make up an apparatus or system.

Elisa test: It is one of the most effective tests to detect the HIV virus. It is a blood test which does not detect the virus, but the presence of antibodies that the body creates to defend against the virus.

Western blot: A laboratory test that detects antibodies to HIV in the blood. The immune system responds to HIV infection with the production of antibodies against that virus.

Clearly understand how within the tests of Elisa and Western blot is diagnosed on "antibodies" and not on the actual detection of a virus, which leads us to conclude that these protocols are accommodated to particular interests and from all points of view are antiscientific .

(*) Scientific Researcher.

Creator and Cultural Manager.

Barranquilla-Colombia.

No hay comentarios: